Proper use of HTTP status codes in a "validation" server

Posted by Romulo A. Ceccon on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Romulo A. Ceccon
Published on 2008-12-12T12:31:57Z Indexed on 2010/04/17 2:03 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 506

Among the data my application sends to a third-party SOA server are complex XMLs. The server owner does provide the XML schemas (.xsd) and, since the server rejects invalid XMLs with a meaningless message, I need to validate them locally before sending.

I could use a stand-alone XML schema validator but they are slow, mainly because of the time required to parse the schema files. So I wrote my own schema validator (in Java, if that matters) in the form of an HTTP Server which caches the already parsed schemas.

The problem is: many things can go wrong in the course of the validation process. Other than unexpected exceptions and successful validation:

  • the server may not find the schema file specified
  • the file specified may not be a valid schema file
  • the XML is invalid against the schema file

Since it's an HTTP Server I'd like to provide the client with meaningful status codes. Should the server answer with a 400 error (Bad request) for all the above cases? Or they have nothing to do with HTTP and it should answer 200 with a message in the body? Any other suggestion?

Update: the main application is written in Ruby, which doesn't have a good xml schema validation library, so a separate validation server is not over-engineering.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about http

Related posts about http-status-codes