Are these tables too big for SQL Server or Oracle
        Posted  
        
            by Jeffrey Cameron
        on Stack Overflow
        
        See other posts from Stack Overflow
        
            or by Jeffrey Cameron
        
        
        
        Published on 2009-11-26T15:36:36Z
        Indexed on 
            2010/04/18
            11:53 UTC
        
        
        Read the original article
        Hit count: 430
        
Hey all,
I'm not much of a database guru so I would like some advice.
Background
We have 4 tables that are currently stored in Sybase IQ. We don't currently have any choice over this, we're basically stuck with what someone else decided for us. Sybase IQ is a column-oriented database that is perfect for a data warehouse. Unfortunately, my project needs to do a lot of transactional updating (we're more of an operational database) so I'm looking for more mainstream alternatives.
Question
Given these tables' dimensions, would anyone consider SQL Server or Oracle to be a viable alternative?
- Table 1 : 172 columns * 32 million rows
 - Table 2 : 453 columns * 7 million rows
 - Table 3 : 112 columns * 13 million rows
 - Table 4 : 147 columns * 2.5 million rows
 
Given the size of data what are the things I should be concerned about in terms of database choice, server configuration, memory, platform, etc.?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner