Does Hibernate always need a setter when there is a getter?
Posted
by Marcus
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Marcus
Published on 2010-04-20T16:08:34Z
Indexed on
2010/04/20
16:13 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 289
We have some Hibernate getter methods annotated with both @Column
and @Basic
.
We get an exception if we don't have the corresponding setter. Why is this?
In our case we are deriving the value returned from the getter (to get stored in the DB) and the setter has no functional purpose. So we just have an empty method to get around the error condition..
© Stack Overflow or respective owner