Is there a way to get a test results and coverage html report from MSTest

Posted by Steve on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Steve
Published on 2009-02-24T12:30:25Z Indexed on 2010/04/20 18:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 300

Filed under:

mstest

|

code-coverage

|

unit-testing

|

reports

I'd like to be able to produce a HTML based report from the Results.trx and data.coverage files that MSTest creates. Ideally this would just list any failures, and show some basic coverage stats.

Does anyone know of a tool that does this?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about mstest

WatiN in MSTest - ClassCleanup fail

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
In thread WatiN in Visual Studio 2008 - second test method fails (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/679347/watin-in-visual-studio-2008-second-test-method-fails) there is a good solution with IEStaticInstanceHelper (original answer Reusing an IE instance in VS test, sources [http://cid-7a759edaf62c1f79… >>> More
TFS 2010 RC does not run Visual Studio 2008 MSTest unit tests

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Steps: Run the build including unit tests. Expected result: the unit tests are executed and succeed. Actual result: the unit tests are built by the build, but this is the result: 1 test run(s) completed - 0% average pass rate (0% total pass rate) 0/4 test(s) passed, 0 failed, 4 … >>> More
First Test Crashes using MSTEST with ASP.NET MVC 1

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm trying to start using Unit Testing and I want to test the following Controller: public class AjaxController : Controller { ... public JsonResult RateVideo( int userRating, long videoId ) { string userName = User.Identity.Name; ... } } I have a created a TestClass… >>> More
MSTEST CollectionAssert use with generics?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
It appears that CollectionAssert cannot be used with generics. This is super frustrating; the code I want to test does use generics. What am I to do? Write boilerplate to convert between the two? Manually check collection equivalence? >>> More
Solution: Testing Web Services with MSTest on Team Build

as seen on Geeks with Blogs - Search for 'Geeks with Blogs'
Guess what. About 20 minutes after I fixed the build, Allan broke it again! Update: 4th March 2010 – After having huge problems getting this working I read Billy Wang’s post which showed me the light. The problem here is that even though the test passes locally it will not during an Automated… >>> More

Related posts about code-coverage

Should we exclude code for the code coverage analysis?

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I'm working on several applications, mainly legacy ones. Currently, their code coverage is quite low: generally between 10 and 50%. Since several weeks, we have recurrent discussions with the Bangalore teams (main part of the development is made offshore in India) regarding the exclusions of packages… >>> More
how to exclude a Web Reference from Code Coverage in VS 2008 Team System

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
When I run my MSTest tests in Visual Studio 2008 Team System and get code coverage results, I always see a particular web service included. I don't care how well this web service is tested, I'm intentionally only using a small part of it. How can I exclude the Web Reference from showing up in my… >>> More
Obtaining C++ Code Coverage

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm on Linux. My code is written in C++. My program is non-interactive; it runs as "./prog input-file", processes the file, and exits. I have various unit tests "input-file0, input-file1, input-file2, ..." For designing new unit tests, I want to know what lines of code existing tests do not cover… >>> More
Why Code Coverage Tools Should Be in Every Developer's Toolbox

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
Explore the world of code coverage tools that help developers create better code in less time. >>> More
Why Code Coverage Tools Should Be in Every Developer's Toolbox

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
Explore the world of code coverage tools that help developers create better code in less time. >>> More