split virtualization design based on environment or server role?

Posted by Dan on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by Dan
Published on 2010-04-20T21:53:41Z Indexed on 2010/04/20 22:03 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 305

Filed under:
|

I'm setting up the server environment for a new software development group, which will include 4 test environments.

These are web applications, so each environment will have an application server and a database server.

I'm planning on buying two physical servers (e.g. 6-core CPU each with 12GB or so of RAM), and I'm thinking virtualization is appropriate here. With that in mind, I've thought of a couple ways that I could organize the virtualization strategy:
- Separated by server role: Server 1 has all the application servers, each in their own guest VM. Server 2 has all the databases. OR
- Separated by environment: Server 1 has a VM for two of the environments, with the VM containing both the app server and the database server. Server 2 would also contain two test environments, with the same style (app server and database in same VM).

The advantages I see with all the app servers on one server and all the databases on another server is that I could probably be more efficient with the database server (one instance running multiple databases). But the other option seems easier to manage (archives/restorations would be contained in a single VM).

Any recommendations? TIA.

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about virtualization

Related posts about server