Scala puts precedence on implicit conversion over "natural" operations... Why? Is this a bug? Or am
Posted
by Alex R
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Alex R
Published on 2010-04-21T13:00:50Z
Indexed on
2010/04/21
13:03 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 158
This simple test, of course, works as expected:
scala> var b = 2 b: Int = 2 scala> b += 1 scala> b res3: Int = 3
Now I bring this into scope:
class A(var x: Int) { def +=(y:Int) { this.x += y } } implicit def int2A(i:Int) : A = new A(i)
I'm defining a new class and a += operation on it.
I never expected this would affect the way my regular Ints behave.
But it does:
scala> var b:Int = 0 b: Int = 0 scala> b += 1 scala> b res29: Int = 0 scala> b += 2 scala> b res31: Int = 0
Scala seems to prefer the implicit conversion over the natural += that is already defined to Ints. That leads to several questions...
- Why? Is this a bug? Is it by design?
- Is there a work-around (other than not using "+=")?
Thanks
© Stack Overflow or respective owner