Why do I have to use the "origin" for the pull to be successfull

Posted by yan bellavance on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by yan bellavance
Published on 2010-04-21T17:25:34Z Indexed on 2010/04/21 17:43 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 132

Filed under:

when I do : git pull BranchName

it tells me everything is up to date but I know that is not true. When I do:

git pull origin BranchName

then I get the files I was expecting.

Is there an easy way to answer this or do I need to provide more details.

PS One thing I did do just to understant themechanics of git is give the branch name in my cloned repo a different name than on the remote repo. I did however put the right name in the config file like so:
[branch "myUDPspinoff"]
remote = origin
merge = refs/heads/UDPspinoff

this worked before on another repo but not this one. And when I put everything in the same name thenI did not need to use origin anymore.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about git