Would SSD drives benefit from a non-default allocation unit size?

Posted by davebug on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by davebug
Published on 2009-05-12T18:40:30Z Indexed on 2010/04/21 14:53 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 176

Filed under:
|
|

The default allocation unit size recommended when formatting a drive in our current set-up is 4096 bytes. I understand the basics of the pros and cons of larger and smaller sizes (performance boost vs. space preservation) but it seems the benefits of a solid state drive (seek times massively lower than hard disks) may create a situation where a much smaller allocation size is not detrimental.

Were this the case it would at least partially help to overcome the disadvantage of SSD (massively higher prices per GB).

Is there a way to determine the 'cost' of smaller allocation sizes specifically related to seek times? Or are there any studies or articles recommending a change from the default based on this newer tech?

(Assume the most average scattering of sizes program files, OS files, data, mp3s, text files, etc.)

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about ssd

Related posts about format