Why collection literals ?
Posted
by Green Hyena
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Green Hyena
Published on 2010-04-23T17:48:48Z
Indexed on
2010/04/23
17:53 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 426
Hi fellow Java programmers.
From the various online articles on Java 7 I have come to know that Java 7 will be having collection literals like the following:
List<String> fruits = [ "Apple", "Mango", "Guava" ];
Set<String> flowers = { "Rose", "Daisy", "Chrysanthemum" };
Map<Integer, String> hindiNums = { 1 : "Ek", 2 : "Do", 3 : "Teen" };
My questions are:
1] Wouldn't it have been possible to provide a static method of
in all of the collection classes which could be used as follows:
List<String> fruits = ArrayList.of("Apple", "Mango", "Guava");
IMO this looks as good as the literal version and is also reasonably concise. Why then did they have to invent a new syntax?
2] When I say List<String> fruits = [ "Apple", "Mango", "Guava" ];
what List
would I actually get? Would it be ArrayList
or LinkedList
or something else?
Thanks.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner