perf tuning for vmfs3 on RAID

Posted by maruti on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by maruti
Published on 2010-04-25T08:30:48Z Indexed on 2010/04/25 8:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 352

Filed under:

esx

|

vmfs

|

raid

|

performance-tuning

recommendations for ESX4 OS - VMFS version3:

matching: RAID-5 stripe size with VMFS block size? (64K, 128K etc)

enabled "adaptive read ahead, write-back" on PERC 6i 90% VMs on server are Windows (2008, 2003, Vista etc, SQL 2005 etc)

i have read that smaller stipes are good for writes and larger for reads. Since this is virtual env, not sure whats good.

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about esx

iSCSI connection timing out on ESX 3.5 against a NetApp storage appliance

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
I get a timeout on iSCSI on different ESX hosts (3.5) at different times. It is puzzling, as both the ESX hosts as windows and other guests are experiencing timeouts. The iSCSI network is segregated on a private network. Here is an export of vmkiscsid.log from last night: 2010-02-10-12:30:38: iscsid:… >>> More
connect two ESX hosts on private LAN

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
can a PC setup as W2K3 DC manage two ESX hosts connected to physical hub/switch? Services: DNS, DHCP, Domain distributed to host using a hub/switch. NIC2 on each host connected to switch/hub...spanning a virtual network inside each ESX host >>> More
Installing esx 3.5 on hpblade 460c G7

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
I was trying to install ESX 3.5 on hp blade 460c but it fails with error no 'network adapter is detected'. Anybody has work around for this. I also tried to install ESX 4.1, it also had the same problem but in case of 4.1 there is support to add your custom driver while installing. So I added NIC… >>> More
What kind of storage do people actually use for VMware ESX servers?

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
VMware and many network evangelists try to tell you that sophisticated (=expensive) fiber SANs are the "only" storage option for VMware ESX and ESXi servers. Well, yes, of course. Using a SAN is fast, reliable and makes vMotion possible. Great. But: Can all ESX/ESXi users really afford SANs? My theory… >>> More
Linked vSphere servers preventing cloning?

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
I've currently got a pair of vSphere5 standard servers (physical, not VAs) managing about a hundred ESX 4.1 and 5 hosts in two different physical and logical datacenters. With our last purchase, we bought another vSphere license for the new vS server. I unmanaged all the ESX servers in one datacenter… >>> More

Related posts about vmfs

VMFS recovery - how do you proceed?

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
The more I look into ESX the more often i have to handle cases where the partition table of a disk with a VMFS volume gets corrupted. The reasons for this can be * idiot user * failed update * power failure * .... I guess you guys must already have something like a usual procedure on how to work… >>> More
VMWare vmfs vs NFS datastore with vmdk?

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
I want to add a new harddisk to an existing VM and want the best performance possible. The new hard disk will exist on an NFS datastore. Currently I did the following: Created new vmdk on NFS datastore Created new lvm partition using fdisk Create new physical volume, volume group, and logical volume… >>> More
ESXi 4.1 host not recognising existing VMFS datastore

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
Existing setup: host1 and host2, ESX 4.0, 2 HBAs each. lun1 and lun2, 2 LUNs belonging to the same RAID set (my terminology might be sketchy here). This has been working just fine all along. I added host3, ESXi 4.1, 2 HBAs. If I view Configuration / Storage Adapters, I can see that both HBAs… >>> More
ESXi 4.1 host not recognising existing VMFS datastore

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
Existing setup: host1 and host2, ESX 4.0, 2 HBAs each. lun1 and lun2, 2 LUNs belonging to the same RAID set (my terminology might be sketchy here). This has been working just fine all along. I added host3, ESXi 4.1, 2 HBAs. If I view Configuration / Storage Adapters, I can see that both HBAs… >>> More
Can I have different ESX hosts accessing the same LUN over different protocols?

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
I currently have a cluster of two ESX 3.5U2 servers connected directly via FiberChannel to a NetApp 3020 cluster. These hosts mount four VMFS LUNs for virtual machine storage. Currently these LUNs are only made available via our FiberChannel initator in the Netapp configuration If I were to add… >>> More