HP DL160 vs DL360 for virtualization
Posted
by Chris
on Server Fault
See other posts from Server Fault
or by Chris
Published on 2010-04-26T15:35:30Z
Indexed on
2010/04/26
15:43 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 549
Hi,
We're planning to consolidate our infrastructure (a dozen servers). We'll buy two or three identical new servers who will be setup as a XenServer pool. Load balancing and HA tools will monitor the pool and vMotion VMs in case of failure/overload.
I know that the DL100 series of HP servers is cheaper than the DL300 serie (in every sense of the word). As we don't need local storage (we have a SAN) and can live with a temporary down server (provided that Xen Server HA tools work as advertized), what are the downsides going with the DL100 serie ?
Thanks,
Chris
© Server Fault or respective owner