Popularity of Git/Mercurial/Bazaar vs. which to recommend
Posted
by Will Robertson
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Will Robertson
Published on 2009-06-15T11:38:45Z
Indexed on
2010/04/26
8:43 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 467
Going by the number of questions on this site for these three distributed version control systems, it seems like Git either
- is more popular, or
- is more difficult (hence requiring more questions), or
- has more features (hence requiring more questions).
Or most probably a combination of the three. (Let's say that popularity on this site equates to popularity at large.) Here are the numbers at time of writing:
[subversion]
or [svn]
: 2353
[git]
: 726
[mercurial]
or [hg]
: 169
[bazaar]
or [bzr]
: 50
The recent historical popularity of Subversion is clearly reflected by the number of questions, indicating at least a small tipping of the scales towards Git over the Mercurial or Bazaar.
It's not entirely satisfactory having three competing yet largely equivalent open source products to choose from. Personally I use Git and I'm fine with the other two. But when it comes to recommending one system over the others, I'd like to ask: can we start recommending one safely yet?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner