What is the advantage of WSDualHttpBinding in WCF?
Posted
by schmoopy
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by schmoopy
Published on 2010-04-26T16:56:06Z
Indexed on
2010/04/26
18:13 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 1033
How much benefit would there be to using WSDualHttpBinding with IIS hosted service vs. a client poll that calls the WCF service, assuming in the latter the service cached the data in question?
This scenerio would be for a notify type of service where the clients need to be notified by the service when an event occurs.
Specifically, what advantages would WSDualHttpBinding provide over polling? ie: Less network traffic, faster to design, easier to maintain, more control ???
From what i understand, WSDualHttpBinding is less scalable than client polling, so why use it at all? Edit: As Matt supplied, time critical can be one reason for the duplex binding.
Here is what i have so far:
WSDualHttpBinding
adv: can get immediate response w/o waiting on polling timer
dis: less scalable than WsHttpBinding dis: less firewall friendly
I'll add to this based on comments, please let me know if i state anything incorrectly.
thanks for you input :-)
© Stack Overflow or respective owner