What's your convention for typedef'ing shared_ptr?
Posted
by Emile Cormier
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Emile Cormier
Published on 2010-04-26T22:40:50Z
Indexed on
2010/04/26
22:43 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 346
I'm flip-flopping between naming conventions for typedef'ing the boost::shared_ptr template. For example:
typedef boost::shared_ptr<Foo> FooPtr;
Before settling on a convention, I'd like to see what others use. What is your convention?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner