Is it bad to have a non-clustered index that contains the primary key from the clustered index?
Posted
by Don
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Don
Published on 2010-04-30T20:00:32Z
Indexed on
2010/04/30
20:07 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 208
If you have a table with a clustered index on the Primary Key (int), is it redundant and bad to have one (ore more) non-clustered indexes that include that primary key column as one of the columns in the non-clustered index?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner