Syntax for specializing function templates
Posted
by FredOverflow
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by FredOverflow
Published on 2010-04-30T20:22:37Z
Indexed on
2010/04/30
20:57 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 398
Is there a difference between the following approaches?
// approach 1
namespace std
{
template<>
void swap<Foo>(Foo& x, Foo& y) // note the <Foo>
{
x.swap(y);
}
}
// approach 2
namespace std
{
template<>
void swap(Foo& x, Foo& y)
{
x.swap(y);
}
}
I stumpled upon this when I tried to specialize swap for my own string type and noticed that swap<::string>
doesn't work, but for a completely different reason :)
© Stack Overflow or respective owner