different small js files per page VS. 1x site-wide js file?
Posted
by Haroldo
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Haroldo
Published on 2010-05-02T10:55:20Z
Indexed on
2010/05/02
11:07 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 263
jQuery
|JavaScript
Different pages of my site have different js needs (plugins mainly), some need a lightbox, some dont, some need a carousel, some dont etc.
With regards to pageloading speed should i
option 1 - reference each js file when it is needed:
so one page might have:
<script type="text/javascript" src="js/carousel/scrollable.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="js/jquery.easydrag.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="js/colorbox/jquery.colorbox-min.js"></script>
and another have:
<script type="text/javascript" src="st_wd_assets/js/carousel/scrollable.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="st_wd_assets/js/typewatch.js"></script>
option 2 - combine and compress into one site_wide.js file:
so each page would reference:
<script type="text/javascript" src="js/site_wide.js"></script>
there would be unused selectors/event listeners though, how bad is this? I would include any plugin notes/accreditations at the top of the site_wide.js file
© Stack Overflow or respective owner