Upgrading Visual Studio web service project says to "convert to web application."

Posted by Buggieboy on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Buggieboy
Published on 2010-05-04T16:29:29Z Indexed on 2010/05/04 16:38 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 285

Filed under:

visual-studio-2008

|

ASP.NET

|

web-applications

|

web-services

I have a Visual Studio 2003 web service project that I have to upgrade to Visual Studio 2008. After I have run the conversion wizard, I get this message:

You have completed the first step in converting your Visual Studio .NET 2003 web project. To complete the conversion, please select your project in the Solution Explorer and choose the 'Convert to Web Application' context menu item.

I got this message with another project, which was originally a "web site", rather than an ASP.NET "web application". It made sense to in that case (sort of). Why, however, would I not just want to have this project remain a web service project?

Additionally, when I follow the instructions and select "Convert to Web Application" from the context menu, I don't get any feedback that anything has changed. Should it have? If so, what?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about visual-studio-2008

Server.transfer causing HttpException

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I am developing a C#/SQL ASP.NET web application in VS 2008. Currently I am using the Server.Transfer method to transfer control from one ASPX.CS file to another ASPX file. The first time through, this works. But after control is transferred to this new file it encounters a condition: if (restart… >>> More
Using Visual Studio 2008 to Assemble, Link, Debug, and Execute MASM 6.11 Assembly Code

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I would like to use Visual Studio 2008 to the greatest extent possible while effectively compiling/linking/building/etc code as if all these build processes were being done by the tools provided with MASM 6.11. The exact version of MASM does not matter, so long as it's within the 6.x range, as that… >>> More
Visual Studio 2008: Don't deploy SQL Server Compact 3.5 when debugging

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, I'm using VS2008 to create a Compact Framework application for a Windows CE 5.0 device (Datalogic Kyman). I'm using SQL Server Compact 3.5 in my application. However, I'm debugging on a Kyman that still has Windows CE 4.2 installed (attached via USB using Mobile Device Center). My problem: VS2008… >>> More
Missing help files for Microsoft.WindowsMobile in Visual Studio 2008 help system

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I've just installed the Windows Mobile 6.5.3 DTK, both standard and professional. Before that I had the standard and professional Windows Mobile 6 SDKs. All Windows Mobile help pages are missing in Visual Studio 2008's help system - in particular everything in the Microsoft.WindowsMobile namespace… >>> More
Visual Studio 2008: Start custom build target via project/solution context menu - without add-in

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have a custom build target in a visual studio 2008 c# project. Is there a simple way to add a context menu item to the project, so that the custom build target can be executed via the ide? The build target is not integrated into the default build process and has to be started by hand. This step… >>> More

Related posts about ASP.NET

Migrating ASP.NET MVC 1.0 applications to ASP.NET MVC 2 RTM

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Note: ASP.NET MVC 2 RTM isn’t yet released! But this tool will help you get your ASP.NET MVC 1.0 applications ready for when it is! I have updated the MVC App Converter to convert projects from ASP.NET MVC 1.0 to ASP.NET MVC 2 RTM. This should be last the last major change to the MVC App Converter… >>> More
April 14th Links: ASP.NET, ASP.NET MVC, ASP.NET Web API and Visual Studio

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Here is the latest in my link-listing blog series: ASP.NET Easily overlooked features in VS 11 Express for Web: Good post by Scott Hanselman that highlights a bunch of easily overlooked improvements that are coming to VS 11 (and specifically the free express editions) for web development: unit… >>> More
Use ASP.NET 4 Browser Definitions with ASP.NET 3.5

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
We updated the browser definitions files included with ASP.NET 4 to include information on recent browsers and devices such as Google Chrome and the iPhone. You can use these browser definition files with earlier versions of ASP.NET such as ASP.NET 3 Read More......(read more) >>> More
ASP.NET webforms + ASP.NET Ajax versus ASP.NET MVC and Ajax framework freedom

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
If given the choice, which path would you take? ASP.NET Webforms + ASP.NET AJAX or ASP.NET MVC + JavaScript Framework of your Choice Are there any limitations that ASP.NET Webforms / ASP.NET AJAX has vis-a-vis MVC? >>> More
ASP.NET MVC 2 Released

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
I’m happy to announce that the final release of ASP.NET MVC 2 is now available for VS 2008/Visual Web Developer 2008 Express with ASP.NET 3.5. You can download and install it from the following locations: Download ASP.NET MVC 2 using the Microsoft Web Platform Installer Download… >>> More