Why should Java ThreadLocal variables be static
Posted
by kellyfj
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by kellyfj
Published on 2010-05-06T19:54:23Z
Indexed on
2010/05/06
19:58 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 180
I was reading that JavaDoc for Threadlocal here
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/ThreadLocal.html
and it says "ThreadLocal instances are typically private static fields in classes that wish to associate state with a thread (e.g., a user ID or Transaction ID). "
But my question is why did they choose to make it static (typically) - it makes it a bit confusing to have "per thread" state but its static?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner