C# internal VS VBNET Friend

Posted by Will Marcouiller on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Will Marcouiller
Published on 2010-05-07T18:11:12Z Indexed on 2010/05/07 18:18 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 313

To this SO question: What is the C# equivalent of friend?, I would personally have answered "internal", just like Ja did among the answers! However, Jon Skeet says that there is no direct equivalence of VB Friend in C#. If Jon Skeet says so, I won't be the one telling otherwise! ;P

I'm wondering how can the keyword internal (C#) not be the equivalent of Friend (VBNET) when their respective definitions are:

Friend VBNET

The Friend (Visual Basic) keyword in the declaration statement specifies that the elements can be accessed from within the same assembly, but not from outside the assembly. [...]

internal C#

Internal: Access is limited to the current assembly.

To my understanding, these definitions mean quite the same to me.

Then, respectively, when I'm coding in VB.NET, I use the Friend keyword to specify that a class or a property shall be accessible only within the assembly where it is declared. The same in C#, I use the internal keyword to specify the same.

  1. Am I doing something or anything wrong from this perspective?

  2. What are the refinements I don't get?

  3. Might someone please explain how or in what Friend and internal are not direct equivalences?

Thanks in advance for any of your answers!

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c#-to-vb.net

Related posts about vb.net-to-c#