Database Performance Across 3 NetApp FAS2050

Posted by bjd145 on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by bjd145
Published on 2010-05-07T02:21:16Z Indexed on 2010/05/07 2:29 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 436

Filed under:
|
|

I recently inherited a SQL Server 2005 box that has LUNs mounted on it from three different NetApp FAS2050 filers. The reason there are three is because the first two filers are out of space and our databases continually need more of it. What kind of performance impact (if any) does this setup have? Is it better to move the LUNs from the two other older filers to the newer one so that we have only one filer/controller for caching, etc ?

This is in general. I apologize for not having more specifics.

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about sql-server

Related posts about storage