Changes to grub in ubuntu 10
Posted
by jdege
on Server Fault
See other posts from Server Fault
or by jdege
Published on 2010-05-09T00:31:23Z
Indexed on
2010/05/09
0:38 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 376
ubuntu-10.04
|grub
I've been running CentOS 5 for some years. I've decided to upgrade to Ubuntu, and with 10.04 just out, this seemed like a good time.
I'm a tad paranoid, so I started off with a new set of drives - one to install on, one to backup to, and one as a spare. I removed my existing CentOS 5 drives, and did an install, and had no problems. I installed the server version, and used the default full-disk LVM installation.
Next, I copies my backup scripts over, edited them to work with the new configuration, and did a test backup. That worked fine, as well. Then comes the real test, could I do an install of the backup onto the spare drive? (I won't put anything of importance on a system that doesn't have a reliable backup, and if I've never done a restore, it's not reliable.)
I booted from a System Rescue CD (ver 1.5.3), with the spare drive as /dev/sda, and the backup drive as /dev/sdb. I had no trouble in partitioning, configuring LVM, formatting, making swap, or restoring the file systems. But when I got to restoring grub to the MBR, I ran into problems.
My restore instructions from CentOS 5 said run grub, then enter two commands:
root (hd0,0) setup (hd0)
The first command exits with an error: "Checking if /boot/grub/stage1 exists ... no"
I did some googling around, and found that the Grub2 included in recent Ubuntus is very different than the Grub 0.97 included in CentOS 5. One site suggested I use:
grub-install --root-dir=/mnt/restore /dev/sda
That appeared to work, but when I booted from the drive, I ended up at a grub prompt.
Any ideas as to what I need to do? It seems like a simple problem, but my attempts at searching out answers on the web are being swamped by references to the old version of Grub.
Help would be appreciated.
© Server Fault or respective owner