What to do if 2 (or more) relationship tables would have the same name?
Posted
by primehunter326
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by primehunter326
Published on 2010-05-09T22:03:19Z
Indexed on
2010/05/09
22:08 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 130
So I know the convention for naming M-M relationship tables in SQL is to have something like so:
For tables User and Data the relationship table would be called
UserData
User_Data
or something similar (from here)
What happens then if you need to have multiple relationships between User and Data, representing each in its own table? I have a site I'm working on where I have two primary items and multiple independent M-M relationships between them. I know I could just use a single relationship table and have a field which determines the relationship type, but I'm not sure whether this is a good solution. Assuming I don't go that route, what naming convention should I follow to work around my original problem?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner