Must a Language that Implements Monads be Statically Typed?

Posted by Morgan Cheng on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Morgan Cheng
Published on 2008-12-27T05:51:31Z Indexed on 2010/05/12 6:14 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 266

I am learning functional programming style. From this link http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Going+Deep/Brian-Beckman-Dont-fear-the-Monads/, Brian Beckman gave a brilliant introduction about Monad. He mentioned that Monad is about composition of functions so as to address complexity.

A Monad includes a unit function that transfers type T to an amplified type M(T); and a Bind function that, given function from T to M(U), transforms type M(T) to another type M(U). (U can be T, but is not necessarily).

In my understanding, the language implementing monad should be type-checked statically. Otherwise, type errors cannot be found during compilation and "Complexity" is not controlled. Is my understanding correct?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about monads

Related posts about functional-programming