Is it faster to count down than it is to count up?
Posted
by Bob
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Bob
Published on 2010-05-12T21:56:13Z
Indexed on
2010/05/13
1:44 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 200
Our computer science teacher once said that for some reason it is more efficient to count down that count up. For example if you need to use a FOR loop and the loop index is not used somewhere (like printing a line of N * to the screen) I mean that code like this :
for (i=N; i>=0; i--)
putchar('*');
is better than:
for (i=0; i<N; i++)
putchar('*');
Is it really true? and if so does anyone know why?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner
