-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
A searh uses recursively defined function that easily throws exceptions. I have tried 3 ways to handle exeptions:
to ignore with an empty-try-catch()
add-dummy-return stop err-propagation due to exeption
throw a specific except. (this part I don't really understand. If I throw except, can I force…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Is it possible to catch a method in the current class the try-catch block is running on? for example:
public static void arrayOutOfBoundsException(){
System.out.println("Array out of bounds");
}
.....
public static void doingSomething(){
try
{
if(something[i] >=…
>>> More
-
as seen on Dot Net Guru
- Search for 'Dot Net Guru'
C'est en somme le conseil donn? par Karl Seguin sur son blog. Pour lui, l'utilisation du try/catch pour g?rer une exception est une mauvaise pratique : "If an exception happens, you need to know about it. If a truly unexpected exception happens, you're better off (most of the time) crashing than…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I think error handling is a good idea. :) When debugging it can get in the way - especially with nice user friendly messages. In VB6 I could just check a box for the compiler to ignore my error handling. I found the dialog that allows me to do something similar in VS, but it's about 10,000 check…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
We are using C# language to develope a Windows application.
Our windows application consists of three layers (UI,Business and DataAccess layer). In Business Layer there are some public (business) methods through which UI communicates wilh Business layer classes. These public methods also have some…
>>> More
