JSF (and friends) tags vs. traditional html tags
Posted
by H3wh0s33ks
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by H3wh0s33ks
Published on 2010-05-13T14:01:44Z
Indexed on
2010/05/13
14:34 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 216
So this question came up today and I didn't have a specific or scientific answer.
What are the costs associated with using jsf (or tomahawk, faclets, etc., etc.) tags in place of traditional html tags. My gut reaction is that you should use jsf tags in situations where you need the additional functionality they provide, and use traditional tags when you don't. Also I feel like jsf tags would require more resources (since the server has to take them and rerender them as html anyways) than html. Does anybody know what the cost actually is (as far as time and memory)? Also useful information is what is the convention that is in use, pure jsf or a mixture of the two?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner