Are there any critical reasons why one could not use ubuntu as a server platform?

Posted by Chiggsy on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by Chiggsy
Published on 2010-05-15T10:46:41Z Indexed on 2010/05/15 10:56 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 286

Filed under:
|
|

We were using Lenny. ( Well Sid, really ). Had to do that for development. I upgraded my server with ubuntu 10.04, for a different project. Noticed the packages. Wearing my developer hat, it's a no brainer. Everything we need is there.

I'm the admin as well. We might need more than one "box" (running on VPS for now). I do not want to build things that apt would put on for me. It's not hard, but I'm going to need that time.

The debian "box" has a bunch of stuff on it, that'll have to be integrated properly, but I think we are going live in a distressingly short time. (Just found out.)

I am aware of the reflexive answers to this question. What I would like to ask is are there critical bugs or critical instabilities that would make one shy away from the ubuntu/server path? I could not find any bugs that would stop me, but perhaps there is something?

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about ubuntu

Related posts about ubuntu-server