Build OpenGL model in parallel?

Posted by Brendan Long on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Brendan Long
Published on 2010-05-16T22:50:27Z Indexed on 2010/05/16 23:00 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 187

Filed under:
|
|

I have a program which draws some terrain and simulates water flowing over it (in a cheap and easy way).

Updating the water was easy to parallelize using OpenMP, so I can do ~50 updates per second. The problem is that even with a small amounts of water, my draws per second are very very low (starts at 5 and drops to around 2 once there's a significant amount of water).

It's not a problem with the video card because the terrain is more complicated and gets drawn so quickly that boost::timer tells me that I get infinity draws per second if I turn the water off. It may be related to memory bandwidth though (since I assume the model stays on the card and doesn't have to be transfered every time).

What I'm concerned about is that on every draw, I'm calling glVertex3f() about a million times (max size is 450*600, 4 vertices each), and it's done entirely sequentially because Glut won't let me call anything in parallel.

So.. is if there's some way of building the list in parallel and then passing it to OpenGL all at once? Or some other way of making it draw this faster? Am I using the wrong method (besides the obvious "use less vertices")?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about opengl

Related posts about c++