WPF with code only

Posted by rwallace on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by rwallace
Published on 2010-05-16T16:08:27Z Indexed on 2010/05/16 16:10 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 266

Filed under:
|
|
|

I've seen a lot of questions about the merits of WPF here, and essentially every answer says it's the bee's knees, but essentially every answer also talks about things like XAML, in many cases graphic designers and Expression Blend etc. My question is, is it worth getting into WPF if you're a solo coder working in C# only?

Specifically, I don't have a graphic designer, nor any great talent in that area myself; I don't use point-and-click tools; I write everything in C#, not XML.

Winforms works fine in those conditions. Is the same true of WPF, or does it turn out that important functions can only be done in XAML, the default settings aren't intended for actual use and you have to have a graphic designer on the team to make things look good, etc., and somebody in my position would be better off to stick to Winforms?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about .NET

Related posts about c#