Building big, immutable objects without using constructors having long parameter lists

Posted by Malax on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Malax
Published on 2010-05-17T12:21:06Z Indexed on 2010/05/17 23:20 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 447

Filed under:

object-oriented-design

|

immutable

|

scala

|

java

Hi StackOverflow!

I have some big (more than 3 fields) Objects which can and should be immutable. Every time I run into that case i tend to create constructor abominations with long parameter lists. It doesn't feel right, is hard to use and readability suffers.

It is even worse if the fields are some sort of collection type like lists. A simple addSibling(S s) would ease the object creation so much but renders the object mutable.

What do you guys use in such cases? I'm on Scala and Java, but i think the problem is language agnostic as long as the language is object oriented.

Solutions I can think of:

"Constructor abominations with long parameter lists"
The Builder Pattern

Thanks for your input!

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about object-oriented-design

Loose Coupling in Object Oriented Design

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I am trying to learn GRASP and I found this explained (here on page 3) about Low Coupling and I was very surprised when I found this: Consider the method addTrack for an Album class, two possible methods are: addTrack( Track t ) and addTrack( int no, String title, double duration… >>> More
Object oriented design importance

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I started studying Object Oriented Design and Modelling using the this book by James Rumbaugh. It uses a tool called Object Modeling Technique (OMT). I have certain newbie questions. I searched the net, but couldn't get answers The book is pretty old. Don't know why the school told me to learn this… >>> More
Object oriented design suggestion

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Here is my code: class Soldier { public: Soldier(const string &name, const Gun &gun); string getName(); private: Gun gun; string name; }; class Gun { public: void fire(); void load(int bullets); int getBullets(); private: int bullets; } I need to call all the member… >>> More
Object Oriented Design Questions

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hello there. I am going to develop a Tic-Tac-Toe game using Java(or maybe other OO Languages).Now I have a picture in my mind about the general design. Interface: Player ,then I will be able to implement a couple of Player classes,based on how I want the opponent to be,for example,random… >>> More
Is Design Pattern only for Object-Oriented design?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I was wondering if all design Patterns are only used in Object-Oriented design? Are there any design patterns used in non Object-Oriented design? Thanks and regards! >>> More

Related posts about immutable

Mutable class as a child of an immutable class

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I want to have immutable Java objects like this (strongly simplyfied): class Immutable { protected String name; public Immutable(String name) { this.name = name; } public String getName() { return name; } } In some cases the object should not only be readable… >>> More
Why are copy constructors unnecessary for immutable objects?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Why are copy constructors unnecessary for immutable objects? Please explain this for me. >>> More
Should this immutable struct be a mutable class?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I showed this struct to a fellow programmer and they felt that it should be a mutable class. They felt it is inconvenient not to have null references and the ability to alter the object as required. I would really like to know if there are any other reasons to make this a mutable class. [Serializable] public… >>> More
why copyconstructor unnecessary for immutable objects?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
why copyconstructor unnecessary for immutable objects?.Please clarify me. >>> More
What's the best name for a non-mutating "add" method on an immutable collection?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Sorry for the waffly title - if I could come up with a concise title, I wouldn't have to ask the question. Suppose I have an immutable list type. It has an operation Foo(x) which returns a new immutable list with the specified argument as an extra element at the end. So to build up a list of strings… >>> More