C# Performance on Errors
Posted
by pm_2
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by pm_2
Published on 2010-05-17T15:47:49Z
Indexed on
2010/05/17
15:50 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 148
It would appear that catching an error is slower that performing a check prior to the error (for example a TryParse). The related questions that prompt this observation are here and here.
Can anyone tell me why this is so - why is it more costly to catch an error that to perform one or many checks of the data to prevent the error?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner