Mercurial vs Subversion. Whose performance is better?

Posted by Chicago on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Chicago
Published on 2010-05-17T16:49:27Z Indexed on 2010/05/17 17:00 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 118

Filed under:
|
|
|

There are a lot of articles about SVN vs. Hg in general. I would like to concentrate only on performance.

Real-live experiences preferred.

Here is my set-up:

(future setup) Windows with IIS fro Hg

(current setup) SVN 1.3.2 on top of apache under windows

I would like to have statistics for most commons operations (commits, stats, local/remote pulls, pushes, etc...). I am not really sure what are the most common operations for Hg.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about mercurial

Related posts about svn