Groovy concurrency: A better way to aggregate results semantically?

Posted by Stefan Kendall on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Stefan Kendall
Published on 2010-05-18T00:12:07Z Indexed on 2010/05/18 0:20 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 507

I need to call a number of methods in parallel and wait for results. Each relies on different resources, so they may return at different times. I need to wait until I receive all results or time out after a certain amount of time.

I could just spawn threads with a reference to a shared object via a method call, but is there a better, more groovy way to do this?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about groovy

Related posts about concurrency