Possible typos in ECMAScript 5 specification?

Posted by Andy West on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Andy West
Published on 2009-12-15T22:42:16Z Indexed on 2010/05/19 19:30 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 388

Does anybody know why, at the end of section 7.6 of the ECMA-262, 5th Edition specification, the nonterminals UnicodeLetter, UnicodeCombiningMark, UnicodeDigit, UnicodeconnectorPunctuation, and UnicodeEscapeSequence are not followed by two colons?

From section 5.1.6:

Nonterminal symbols are shown in italic type. The definition of a nonterminal is introduced by the name of the nonterminal being defined followed by one or more colons. (The number of colons indicates to which grammar the production belongs.)

Since lexical productions are distinguished by having two colons, and this is under "Lexical Conventions", I'm assuming that they meant to put the colons in. Does that sound right?

Just making sure that these really are nonterminals and they really are part of the lexical grammar.

EDIT:

I noticed there have been votes to close this. Just to make my case about why this is programming-related, it is relevant to anyone wanting to implement an ECMAScript interpreter.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about ecmascript

Related posts about specifications