Java Runtime.getRuntime().exec() alternatives

Posted by twilbrand on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by twilbrand
Published on 2010-05-20T19:04:15Z Indexed on 2010/05/20 20:10 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 792

I have a collection of webapps that are running under tomcat. Tomcat is configured to have as much as 2 GB of memory using the -Xmx argument.

Many of the webapps need to perform a task that ends up making use of the following code:

Runtime runtime = Runtime.getRuntime();
Process process = runtime.exec(command);
process.waitFor();
...

The issue we are having is related to the way that this "child-process" is getting created on Linux (Redhat 4.4 and Centos 5.4).

It's my understanding that an amount of memory equal to the amount tomcat is using needs to be free in the pool of physical (non-swap) system memory initially for this child process to be created. When we don't have enough free physical memory, we are getting this:

    java.io.IOException: error=12, Cannot allocate memory
    at java.lang.UNIXProcess.<init>(UNIXProcess.java:148)
    at java.lang.ProcessImpl.start(ProcessImpl.java:65)
    at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:452)
    ... 28 more

My questions are:

1) Is it possible to remove the requirement for an amount of memory equal to the parent process being free in the physical memory? I'm looking for an answer that allows me to specify how much memory the child process gets or to allow java on linux to access swap memory.

2) What are the alternatives to Runtime.getRuntime().exec() if no solution to #1 exists? I could only think of two, neither of which is very desirable. JNI (very un-desirable) or rewriting the program we are calling in java and making it it's own process that the webapp communicates with somehow. There has to be others.

3) Is there another side to this problem that I'm not seeing that could potentially fix it? Lowering the amount of memory used by tomcat is not an option. Increasing the memory on the server is always an option, but seems like more a band-aid.

Servers are running java 6.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about java

Related posts about tomcat