Performance Testing Versus Unit Testing
Posted
by Mystagogue
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Mystagogue
Published on 2010-05-20T00:24:32Z
Indexed on
2010/05/20
0:30 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 453
unit-testing
|Performance
I'm reading Osherove's "The Art of Unit Testing," and though I've not yet seen him say anything about performance testing, two thoughts still cross my mind:
- Performance tests generally can't be unit tests, because performance tests generally need to run for long periods of time.
- Performance tests generally can't be unit tests, because performance issues too often manifest at an integration or system level (or at least the logic of a single unit test needed to re-create the performance of the integration environment would be too involved to be a unit test).
Particularly for the first reason stated above, I doubt it makes sense for performance tests to be handled by a unit testing framework (such as NUnit).
My question is: do my findings / leanings correspond with the thoughts of the community?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner