Generics and Exposing .Net Types For COM Consumers?
Posted
by IbrarMumtaz
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by IbrarMumtaz
Published on 2010-05-20T23:31:25Z
Indexed on
2010/05/21
0:00 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 293
I remember seeing a question on my official MS 70-536 exam that talked about a simple class that was designed to be exposed for COM calling clients and etc. of all the members defined in the classes I chose the answer D. The one that used a generic.
My question to you guys is this: If you were designing a .net custom type that was to be eventually consumed by a com caller or a com type .... of all the guidelines I have read on this subject. Generics is the one .Net topic I would not include in a class for this purpose I would omit such a data member or use something else? Am I right in thinking this. As soon as I saw this question I knew it was generics but I can't seem to prove it. Surely I did not make this up ... generics is a .net feature right?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner