SCOM 2007 versus Zenoss (or other open source)

Posted by TheCleaner on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by TheCleaner
Published on 2009-07-08T02:39:43Z Indexed on 2010/05/21 14:41 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 1234

Filed under:
|
|
|

I've taken the liberty to test both SCOM 2007 and Zenoss and found the following:

SCOM 2007

Pros:

  • Great MS Windows server monitoring and reporting
  • In-depth configuration and easily integrates into a "MS datacenter"

Cons:

  • limited network device monitoring support (without 3rd party plugins)
  • expensive
  • difficult learning curve

Zenoss

Pros:

  • Open Source (free)
  • decent server monitoring for Windows, great monitoring for Linux
  • decent network device monitoring

Cons:

  • not as in-depth as SCOM (for Windows at least)


So my question to you folks is this:

Given the above, and given that I'm trying to monitor 55 Windows servers, 1 Linux server, 2 ESX servers, and Juniper equipment...which would you recommend?

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about Windows

Related posts about monitoring