xinet vs iptables for port forwarding performance
Posted
by jamie.mccrindle
on Super User
See other posts from Super User
or by jamie.mccrindle
Published on 2010-05-27T08:59:35Z
Indexed on
2010/05/27
9:02 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 418
I have a requirement to run a Java based web server on port 80. The options are:
- Web proxy (apache, nginx etc.)
- xinet
- iptables
- setuid
The baseline would be running the app using setuid but I'd prefer not to for security reasons. Apache is too slow and nginx doesn't support keep-alives so new connections are made for every proxied request.
xinet is easy to set up but creates a new process for every request which I've seen cause problems in a high performance environment.
The last option is port forwarding with iptables but I have no experience of how fast it is.
Of course, the ideal solution would be to do this on a dedicated hardware firewall / load balancer but that's not an option at present.
© Super User or respective owner