Are Symphony and CakePHP too slow to be usable?

Posted by Aziz Light on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Aziz Light
Published on 2010-05-28T12:26:59Z Indexed on 2010/05/28 14:12 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 347

Filed under:
|
|
|
|

Until now, I have always said that CakePHP is too bloated and slow. I don't really know that, I just saw "some" benchmarks. What I really want to know, is that if those two frameworks (Symfony and CakePHP) are too slow to be usable in a way that the user will get frustrated. I already know that those frameworks are slower than other alternatives, but that's not the question.

I ask the question because I want to create a project management web application and I still hesitate between a couple frameworks. I've had some trouble learning Zend, but imho I haven't tried hard enough.

So in conclusion, in addition to the first question above, I would like to ask another question:

If I want to create a project management tool (which is a pretty big project), which of the following should you suggest, considering the developement time, the speed of the resulting application, and the robustness of the final product:

  • Symphony
  • CakePHP
  • Zend Framework

Also I should mention that I don't know any of those frameworks, and that I want to learn one of them (at least).

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Are Symphony and CakePHP too slow to be usable?

Posted by stackuser1 on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by stackuser1
Published on 2010-05-28T13:31:51Z Indexed on 2010/05/28 13:42 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 347

Filed under:
|

Are Symphony and CakePHP too slow to be usable? Are Symphony and CakePHP too slow to be usable?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about php

Related posts about zend-framework