Are there any less costlier alternatives to Amazon's Relational Database Services (RDS)?
Posted
by swapnonil
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by swapnonil
Published on 2010-05-30T07:30:58Z
Indexed on
2010/05/30
7:32 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 215
amazon-web-services
|amazon-rds
Hi All,
I have the following requirement. I have with me a database containing the contact and address details of at least 2000 members of my school alumni organization. We want to store all that information in a relation model so that
- This data can be created and edited on demand.
- This data is always backed up and should be simple to restore in case the master copy becomes unusable.
- All sensitive personal information residing in this database is guaranteed to be available only to authorized users.
- This database won't be online in the first 6 months. It will become online only after a website is built on top of it.
I am not a DBA and I don't want to spend time doing things like backups. I thought Amazon's RDS with it's automatic backup facility was the perfect solution for our needs. The only problem is that being a voluntary organization we cannot spare the monthly $100 to $150 fees this service demands.
So my question is, are there any less costlier alternatives to Amazon's RDS?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner