Valid javascript object property names
Posted
by hawkettc
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by hawkettc
Published on 2010-05-30T21:33:07Z
Indexed on
2010/05/30
21:42 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 212
JavaScript
I'm trying to work out what is considered valid for the property name of a javascript object. For example
var b = {}
b['-^colour'] = "blue"; // Works fine in Firefox, Chrome, Safari
b['colour'] = "green"; // Ditto
alert(b['-^colour']); // Ditto
alert(b.colour); // Ditto
for(prop in b) alert(prop); // Ditto
//alert(b.-^colour); // Fails (expected)
This post details valid javascript variable names, and '-^colour' is clearly not valid (as a variable name). Does the same apply to object property names? Looking at the above I'm trying to work out if
b['-^colour'] is invalid, but works in all browsers by quirk, and I shouldn't trust it to work going forward
b['-^colour'] is completely valid, but it's just of a form that can only be accessed in this manner - (it's supported so Objects can be used as maps perhaps?)
Something else
As an aside, a global variable in javascript might be declared at the top level as
var abc = 0;
but could also be created (as I understand it) with
window['abc'] = 0;
the following works in all the above browsers
window['@£$%'] = "bling!";
alert(window['@£$%']);
Is this valid? It seems to contradict the variable naming rules - or am I not declaring a variable there? What's the difference between a variable and an object property name?
Cheers,
Colin
© Stack Overflow or respective owner