Valid javascript object property names

Posted by hawkettc on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by hawkettc
Published on 2010-05-30T21:33:07Z Indexed on 2010/05/30 21:42 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 212

Filed under:

I'm trying to work out what is considered valid for the property name of a javascript object. For example

var b = {}
b['-^colour'] = "blue";     // Works fine in Firefox, Chrome, Safari
b['colour'] = "green";      // Ditto
alert(b['-^colour']);       // Ditto
alert(b.colour);            // Ditto
for(prop in b) alert(prop); // Ditto
//alert(b.-^colour);     // Fails (expected)

This post details valid javascript variable names, and '-^colour' is clearly not valid (as a variable name). Does the same apply to object property names? Looking at the above I'm trying to work out if

  1. b['-^colour'] is invalid, but works in all browsers by quirk, and I shouldn't trust it to work going forward

  2. b['-^colour'] is completely valid, but it's just of a form that can only be accessed in this manner - (it's supported so Objects can be used as maps perhaps?)

  3. Something else

As an aside, a global variable in javascript might be declared at the top level as

var abc = 0;

but could also be created (as I understand it) with

window['abc'] = 0;

the following works in all the above browsers

window['@£$%'] = "bling!";
alert(window['@£$%']);

Is this valid? It seems to contradict the variable naming rules - or am I not declaring a variable there? What's the difference between a variable and an object property name?

Cheers,

Colin

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about JavaScript