Why call-by-value evaluation strategy is not Turing complete?
Posted
by Roman
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Roman
Published on 2010-05-31T15:06:07Z
Indexed on
2010/05/31
20:33 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 150
I'm reading an article about different evaluation strategies (I linked article in wiki, but I'm reading another one not in English). And it says that unlike to call-by-name
and call-by-need
strategies, call-by-value
strategy is not Turing complete.
Can anybody explain, please, why is it so? If it's possible, add an example pls.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner