Doing a UNION ALL on two different COUNTs using Linq-To-Sql

Posted by Danno on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Danno
Published on 2010-06-01T18:46:53Z Indexed on 2010/06/01 19:03 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 181

Filed under:

linq-to-sql

Is it possible to write a linq-to-sql statement that will return two different COUNTs that have been put into a single dataset using UNION ALL?

I know this is syntactically wrong but here's what I'm trying to do:

(from t1 in TableOne select t1).Count().Union(
    (from t2 in TableTwo select t2).Count()
)

Here's the sql I would like would like to have generated:

select count(*) from TableOne
union all
select count(*) from TableTwo

I realize that Count() returns an int and does not have a Union method on it and therein lies my question. Can Linq-to-Sql be written that will achieve what I'm after?

Related posts about linq-to-sql

how can i page my linq to sql result set

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Remembering MySQL could use the instruction "limit" to indicate where I was starting my result set and how many wanted to have included. Select * FROM Users Limit [start], [Length] How can I do this in LinqToSql >>> More
LINQ to SQL and missing Many to Many EntityRefs

as seen on West-Wind - Search for 'West-Wind'
Ran into an odd behavior today with a many to many mapping of one of my tables in LINQ to SQL. Many to many mappings aren’t transparent in LINQ to SQL and it maps the link table the same way the SQL schema has it when creating one. In other words LINQ to SQL isn’t smart about many to many mappings… >>> More
Comparing LINQ to SQL vs the classic SqlCommand

as seen on Dot net Slackers - Search for 'Dot net Slackers'
tweetmeme_url = 'http://alpascual.com/blog/comparing-linq-to-sql-vs-the-classic-sqlcommand/';tweetmeme_source = 'alpascual';When you are coming from using SqlCommand and SqlConnection is difficult to move to another library for your database needs. For those people still in the limbo to make the decision… >>> More
Comparing LINQ to SQL vs the classic SqlCommand

as seen on Dot net Slackers - Search for 'Dot net Slackers'
tweetmeme_url = 'http://alpascual.com/blog/comparing-linq-to-sql-vs-the-classic-sqlcommand/';tweetmeme_source = 'alpascual';When you are coming from using SqlCommand and SqlConnection is difficult to move to another library for your database needs. For those people still in the limbo to make the decision… >>> More
LINQ to SQL Profiler

as seen on Dot net Slackers - Search for 'Dot net Slackers'
In this article we will be taking a look at the new LINQ to SQL Profiler from HibernatingRhinos. This tool gives you a view into the goings on of LINQ to SQL. Not only does it allow you to see the SQL that is generated by your LINQ queries but it also shows you information about your connections… >>> More

Developer IT

Doing a UNION ALL on two different COUNTs using Linq-To-Sql - Developer IT

Doing a UNION ALL on two different COUNTs using Linq-To-Sql

linq-to-sql

Related posts about linq-to-sql

how can i page my linq to sql result set

LINQ to SQL and missing Many to Many EntityRefs

Comparing LINQ to SQL vs the classic SqlCommand

Comparing LINQ to SQL vs the classic SqlCommand

LINQ to SQL Profiler

Categories cloud