Practical RAID Performance?
Posted
by wag2639
on Super User
See other posts from Super User
or by wag2639
Published on 2010-06-02T06:38:07Z
Indexed on
2010/06/02
6:44 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 479
I've always thought the following to be a general rule of thumb for RAID:
- RAID 0: Best performance for READ and WRITE from stripping, greatest risk
- RAID 1: Redundant, decent for READ (I believe it can read from different parts of a file from different hard drives), not the best for WRITE
- RAID 0+1 (01): combines redundancy of RAID 1 with performance of RAID 0
- RAID 1+0 (10): slightly better version of RAID 0+1
- RAID 5: good READ performance, bad WRITE performance, redundant
IS THIS ASSUMPTION CORRECT? (and how do they compare to a JBOD setup for R/W IO performance)
Are certain practical RAID setups better for different applications: gaming, video editing, database (Acccess or SQL)?
I was thinking about hard disk drives but does this apply to solid state drives as well?
© Super User or respective owner