Comparison of Hudson, CDash, CruisonControl, TeamCity for Continuous Integration / Builder
Posted
by Wernight
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Wernight
Published on 2010-06-03T09:53:16Z
Indexed on
2010/06/03
9:54 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 551
I found most people talk about Hudson for simple and free continuous integration. Now personally I'm not fond of its interface which I find very messy, and I found almost no one talking about CDash -- I love CMake and CTest seem nice too.
Could you give for each continuous integration server/builder/tester/dashboard a short description of its strong and weak decision points. Here is a list of those I've heard of, or used:
Environment: C++, C#, Python, PHP... can be various.
PS: Preferably give one answer per tool or comment on it there is already one.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner