Comparison of Hudson, CDash, CruisonControl, TeamCity for Continuous Integration / Builder

Posted by Wernight on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Wernight
Published on 2010-06-03T09:53:16Z Indexed on 2010/06/03 9:54 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 551

I found most people talk about Hudson for simple and free continuous integration. Now personally I'm not fond of its interface which I find very messy, and I found almost no one talking about CDash -- I love CMake and CTest seem nice too.

Could you give for each continuous integration server/builder/tester/dashboard a short description of its strong and weak decision points. Here is a list of those I've heard of, or used:

Environment: C++, C#, Python, PHP... can be various.

PS: Preferably give one answer per tool or comment on it there is already one.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about comparison

Related posts about continuous-integration