Why TVs are costlier than Monitor for same screen size?
Posted
by Vikrant Chaudhary
on Super User
See other posts from Super User
or by Vikrant Chaudhary
Published on 2010-06-03T15:44:29Z
Indexed on
2010/06/03
15:45 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 342
Just wondering, why LCD/LED-backlit TVs cost more (almost double) than LCD/LED-backlit monitors for same screen size.
Because I guess that TVs and Monitors, both use almost same technologies and both nowadays support some common connectors (HDMI/D-Sub/DVI etc).
And since a Monitor has much higher resolution than a TV for that size, and they are used more closely than TVs, Monitors probably require more engineering effort. So, Monitors are supposed to be costlier than TVs, right?
Ex: A ViewSonic (or any) 22"/26" monitor supports Full-HD resolution at 1080p (WSXGA+-1680×1050, WUXGA-1920×1200), while all 22"/26" HDTVs support HD-ready 720p (WXGA-1366x768) only, which is also the resolution of my Notebook's 15.6" screen.
© Super User or respective owner