Make function declarations based on function definitions

Posted by Clinton Blackmore on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Clinton Blackmore
Published on 2010-06-05T14:44:32Z Indexed on 2010/06/05 14:52 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 211

Filed under:
|
|
|
|

I've written a .cpp file with a number of functions in it, and now need to declare them in the header file. It occurred to me that I could grep the file for the class name, and get the declarations that way, and it would've worked well enough, too, had the complete function declaration before the definition -- return code, name, and parameters (but not function body) -- been on one line.

It seems to me that this is something that would be generally useful, and must've been solved a number of times. I am happy to edit the output and not worried about edge cases; anything that gives me results that are right 95% of the time would be great.

So, if, for example, my .cpp file had:

i2cstatus_t NXTI2CDevice::writeRegisters(
    uint8_t  start_register,    // start of the register range
    uint8_t  bytes_to_write,    // number of bytes to write
    uint8_t* buffer = 0)        // optional user-supplied buffer
{
...
}

and a number of other similar functions, getting this back:

i2cstatus_t NXTI2CDevice::writeRegisters(
        uint8_t  start_register,    // start of the register range
        uint8_t  bytes_to_write,    // number of bytes to write
        uint8_t* buffer = 0)

for inclusion in the header file, after a little editing, would be fine.

Getting this back:

i2cstatus_t writeRegisters(
        uint8_t  start_register,    
        uint8_t  bytes_to_write,    
        uint8_t* buffer);

or this:

i2cstatus_t writeRegisters(uint8_t  start_register, uint8_t  bytes_to_write, uint8_t* buffer);

would be even better.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c++

Related posts about function