Using memcpy in the STL
Posted
by wowus
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by wowus
Published on 2010-06-08T23:44:00Z
Indexed on
2010/06/08
23:52 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 326
Why does C++'s vector class call copy constructors? Why doesn't it just memcpy the underlying data? Wouldn't that be a lot faster, and remove half of the need for move semantics?
I can't imagine a use case where this would be worse, but then again, maybe it's just because I'm being quite unimaginative.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner